Testing MegaFood Baby & Me 2 Prenatal Multi (with Folate & Choline) for Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, & Arsenic: 2024 Lab Report.
A Quick Note from Tamara Rubin:
The test results for this particular prenatal vitamin are quite alarming. It’s only the second prenatal vitamin we have tested (out of 11 tested and reported on to date) that has tested positive for Mercury, and the Mercury level in this vitamin is significantly higher than the Mercury level in the other prenatal vitamin that we found to test positive for Mercury. You can see our comparative chart of all of the prenatal vitamins we have tested here on this link. We have not yet found a prenatal vitamin that has tested non-detect for toxicants, so we do not have a recommended alternative at this time. Our recommendation is that you may want to talk to your doctor if you have been taking this vitamin. A heavy metal panel test (either blood or urine) may be warranted as well. Provoked urine testing is not recommend for pregnant women – however if you are not pregnant you may want to ask your doctor about that option as it is more likely to show past exposure (blood testing for heavy metals only shows a recent snapshot of what is currently circulating in your body). You can read more about urine testing here.
We have several additional open fundraising campaigns to cover the cost of testing and reporting on prenatal vitamins that have been nominated by the Lead Safe Mama online community – and you can see those here on this link.
The full lab report for this product is at the bottom of this article.
As far as safer choices for foods and supplements go, we have a few lists on our food & supplement testing landing page (linked here) that you may find helpful in making safer choices for your family. We even have one dedicated to safer snack choices here. You may also find this link helpful as it takes you to our most recently updated safer choices list of 42 lab tested safer foods!
For those new to the Lead Safe Mama website:
Tamara Rubin is a multiple-federal-award-winning independent advocate for childhood Lead poisoning prevention and consumer goods safety, and a documentary filmmaker. She is also a mother of Lead-poisoned children (two of her four sons were acutely Lead-poisoned in 2005).
- Tamara owns and runs Lead Safe Mama, LLC — a unique community collaborative woman-owned small business for childhood Lead poisoning prevention and consumer goods safety.
- Since July 2022, the work of Lead Safe Mama, LLC has been responsible for six product recalls (FDA and CPSC).
- All test results reported on this website are science-based, accurate, and replicable.
- Please check out our press page to see some of the news coverage of our work, linked here.
This is an ad-free article.
Advertising and affiliate income help Lead Safe Mama, LLC cover the costs of the work we do here (independent consumer goods testing and childhood Lead poisoning prevention advocacy). We have removed ads from most of our more widely-read articles (and newly published articles, too — like this one!) to make them easier for you to read. In addition to supporting this work by starting any shopping you might be doing with a click on our affiliate links, if you would like to support the independent consumer goods testing and childhood Lead poisoning prevention advocacy work of Lead Safe Mama, LLC by making a contribution (which will also help us keep our more widely-read articles ad-free), click here. Thank you!
Important Background: What is an Action Level?
Please note the following key points:
The original lab report for this product is below (at the bottom of this page).
The graphic above shows the levels of metals detected in this product (in red) along with the low threshold of detection (in orange, above the action levels discussed/ or in green, below the action levels discussed) for each metal not detected with the laboratory testing Lead Safe Mama, LLC had completed for this product. The numbers are juxtaposed (in blue) to the “Action Level” proposed by the medical and scientific community in 2021 as part of the Baby Food Safety Act.
- These 2021 levels were proposed as “Action Levels” because they are (in fact) protective of human health.
- An “Action Level” is NOT the same as a “Maximum Allowable Level” or a “Recommended Daily Amount” – if a product reaches the “Action Level” for heavy metals, it has too much of the heavy metals in question.
- Many food & supplement manufacturers misinterpret existing guidance on heavy metals to mean the stated levels are “allowable levels” or “acceptable levels” (in spite of the scientific consensus that there is no safe level of Lead exposure – for example) and consider it reasonable for their products to test positive for heavy metals, but at levels that fall below any regulated maximums.
- This is a (perhaps intentional?) misunderstanding/ misinterpretation the food & supplement industry makes — a misunderstanding that food manufacturers use to justify the presence of heavy metals in products.
- As an example: a common refrain in this realm is when a supplement or food manufacturer proudly proclaims that their product meets prop 65 guidelines as it tests positive for Lead, but under the limit noted by Prop 65. This position entirely disregards the well known scientific fact that there is no safe level of Lead exposure for humans.
- Heavy metals accumulate in the body.
- It is the cumulative/ aggregate impact of heavy metal exposure (over a lifetime) that makes even small/ incidental/ seemingly trivial exposures particularly damaging and dangerous. You can read more about that here.
- Once a food or supplement product has the amount of heavy metal (Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, or Arsenic) noted (above) as the “Action Level,” that product is officially considered (by the scientific and medical community) to have metals at a level that is unsafe for consumption by children —as toxicants (found at-or-above these levels) are in the range of heavy metal levels that have been demonstrated to cause lasting harm.
- Action Levels are a better (more health-protective) metric than Prop 65 limits as they are more comprehensive and NOT RELATED TO SERVING SIZE .
- Serving sizes are set by manufacturers and in many cases do not reflect real world consumption habits and patterns (more on that below).
- Serving size thresholds for toxicity also do not take into account realistic levels of toxicant ingestion from multiple foods and supplements over the course of a given day – or week – or month (especially given the fact that many products are typically consumed in quantities far greater than a manufacturer-set serving size).
- Serving sizes are often set to quantities that are intentionally lower than anticipated actually daily consumption of a product (see bag of potato chips example below) – set to these lower quantities specifically only in order for the company to be in compliance with Prop 65 (or other serving-size related) standards.
- On the other hand , Action Levels are relevant for any amount of a food or supplement product that may be consumed (any quantity of the food or supplement in question).
- Action levels are a better (more health-protective) measure as they would take into account the total heavy metals content of all products consumed throughout the day (were there to be a federally mandated, health protective Action Level for all ingested items).
- If the Action Level for all items is protective of children’s health – one would never need to have any attention on how much of a product a child was consuming.
- Action levels are a more reasonable metric in light of the fact that all federal agencies agree that there is no safe level of Lead exposure (especially for children, but truly for all humans).
- If we are evaluating Lead exposure based on serving size we are contradicting science by asserting that a certain amount of Lead is ok (within arbitrary limits that – again – are not protective of human health).
- PPB (parts per billion/ ppb) measurements are a percentage (albeit a very small percentage) and apply to any quantity of any food or supplement product (tested or ingested).
- If all ingested foods and supplements were evaluated by ppb content for heavy metals across the board (using the same scale for all types of ingested products), confusion over safety limits would be eliminated.
- By retaining a structure of serving-size based exposure our regulatory agencies are doing a disservice to consumers – again (& especially) as all federal agencies (and scientists and medical experts) agree that there is no safe level of Lead exposure.
- For more discussion about serving size considerations (and why relying on “serving size” to limit toxicant exposure is not a relevant metric/ not a metric protective of human health), read this article.
- These “Action Levels” proposed in 2021 are the levels at which the scientific and medical community believe the manufacturer (or government) needs to take ACTION to fix the problem.
- One “Action” would be for the manufacturer to take steps to reduce the levels of toxicants in the food or supplement product.
- Another “Action” would be for the manufacturer to cease sales of the product until the product could be made safe.
- Another “Action” would be for the manufacturer to inform the public that a specific food or supplement product has an unsafe level of the metal detected at-or-above the “Action Level” — making a highly-visible public announcement regarding which relevant batches of the product should be recalled/ no longer consumed.
- The Action Levels proposed with the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021 were not arbitrary toxicant levels, but were proposed because they are the levels most protective of human health. However, the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021 was not passed into law.
- Regardless of the fact the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021 never passed into law — and it is therefore legal to have foods and supplements marketed for consumption by children test positive for Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, and Arsenic at-or-above these levels — these Action Levels still reflect the current (modern/ relevant) advice of the medical and scientific communities as levels both achievable by the industry and safeguards of infant and toddler health.
- Food and supplement industry lobbyists fought against formalizing these proposed “Action Levels” as a government standard, alleging the levels were unachievable.
- The list of safer choices (below) clearly demonstrate these Action Levels as achievable across a range of food and supplement types (vitamins, salt, flour, coffee, oatmeal, chia seeds, hemp seeds, soy milk, packaged fruit-based snacks, beverages, and more).
- The legitimacy of these levels as “Action Levels”/ “Levels of Concern” (even though they were not adopted as law) is mirrored by the legitimacy of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ level of concern for Lead in water, which is 1 ppb despite the FDA’s official “level of concern” for Lead in water being 15 ppb (you can read more about that here).
“Simply Not Achievable”
To reiterate: While the packaged, processed food industry would have consumers (and the government) believe the standards proposed in 2021 are unachievable, this industry position (an oft-rearticulated response to nearly every set of laboratory test results for food and supplements that we have published to date) is simply not true.
It is possible to make safer processed, packaged food products and supplements that fall well below the safety limits for toxicants proposed within the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021. To wit, the products listed below (the first section of the list below) tested “non-detect” for Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, and Arsenic — several even tested non-detect for Lead with the low threshold of detection being “less than 1.5 ppb.”
Below is an EXPANDING list of products (foods and supplements) that have tested “non-detect” for Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic with independent, third-party, crowd-funded laboratory testing coordinated by Lead Safe Mama, LLC (an Oregon-based small business with a unique community-collaborative business model and a focus on consumer goods safety and childhood Lead poisoning prevention).
–
The limits of detection for each of the metals tested are noted in the lab report for the specific product listed. To see the full lab report for any of these products, type the brand name into the search bar at the top of any page on Lead Safe Mama dot com (and scroll down to the bottom of the related article).
–
Flavors tested are noted, and other flavors of the same product (or other products from the same brand) have either not been tested or have been tested but did not yield similar results. Test results only apply to the specific products linked below.
LIST UPDATED January 01, 2025 – 45 Products!:
- Baby Food — 1 — Little Spoon Kale, Carrot + Pear BabyBlends
- Baby Food — 2 —Little Spoon Butternut Squash + Blueberry BabyBlends
- Baby Food — 3 — Little Spoon Sweet Potato BabyBlends
- Baby Food — 4 — Little Spoon Sweet Potato + Carrot BabyBlends
- Baby Food — 5 — Little Spoon Banana + Pitaya BabyBlends
- Beverage — 1 — Honest Kids Organic Appley Ever After Apple Juice Drink: https://amzn.to/4fjGhov
- Beverage — 2 — Olipop Grape Tonic: https://amzn.to/4cjFYZu
- Breakfast Item — 1 — Nature’s Path Envirokidz Organic Panda Puffs: https://amzn.to/4fo1crf
- Breakfast Item — 2 — One Degree Organic, Gluten-Free, Sprouted Rolled Oats (Canada): https://amzn.to/3WIQ1BN
- Candy — Lindt White Chocolate Bar (Made in USA – New Hampshire): https://amzn.to/3OXkyIm
- Candy — Cavendish & Harvey Wild Berry Drops, not organic (Germany): https://amzn.to/3Z1Jxjr
- Coffee & Tea — 1 — Chameleon Handcrafted Organic Cold Brew Concentrate: https://amzn.to/3OcrH77
- Coffee & Tea — 2 — Tao of Tea Organic Genmaicha (Tamara’s favorite, from Japan, sold by a Portland, Oregon-based company!): https://amzn.to/3Dp8Fsd
- Coffee & Tea — 3 — Califia Farms Almond Latte Cold Brew (XX Espresso): https://amzn.to/4gTTGoJ
- Coffee & Tea — 4 — Death Wish Organic Espresso Roast Ground Coffee (Multi-country origin, non-USA): https://amzn.to/3yo1eiL
- Coffee Creamer — Plant-Based — 1 — Laird Superfood Coconut Creamer: https://amzn.to/4fItA7A
- Coffee Creamer — Dairy — 2 — Organic Valley Grassmilk Half and Half: https://amzn.to/4fHJIWT
- Dairy, Cheese – Babybel Mini Original Snack Cheese: https://amzn.to/3ZY5noO
- Fruit Snack — 1 — GoGo Squeez Organic Apple Sauce Pouch: https://amzn.to/3XhWYLe
- Fruit Snack — 2 — Pure Organic Layered Fruit Bars in Strawberry Banana Flavor: https://amzn.to/3WQEekA
- Fruit Snack — 3 — Once Upon A Farm Dairy Free Fruit Smoothie Pouch in Strawberry Banana Swirl Flavor: https://amzn.to/3CPMbAw
- Fruit Snack — 4 — Pure Organic Layered Fruit Bars in Raspberry Lemonade Flavor: https://amzn.to/3XcFsIp
- Infant Formula — 1 — Bobbie Organic Gentle Infant Formula Milk-Based Powder with Iron (Pink & White Can): https://amzn.to/3YYb849
- Infant Formula — 2 — Bobbie Organic Infant Formula – Milk-Based Powder With Iron (Green & White Can): https://amzn.to/3VOr4Vy
- Infant Formula — 3 — Bobbie Grass-Fed Milk-Based Powder with Iron (Green Can): https://amzn.to/3ZlAaeJ
- Infant Formula — 4 — ByHeart Infant Formula (USA-Made, not organic): https://amzn.to/48DJjTb
- Infant Formula — 5 — HiPP Bio Combiotik Infant Formula Powder – Stage 1 (imported)
- Infant Formula — 6 — Holle Bio Goat Stage 2 Infant Formula (for 6-10 months, organic, European — Swiss/ German/ Austrian) is not available on Amazon, but the Stage 3 version of this product is (not yet tested, but will likely test similarly): https://amzn.to/3BVU7zI
- Infant Formula — 7 — Kendamil Goat Infant Formula (not organic): This product may be available at Target (it is not available on Amazon)
- Infant Formula — 8 — Kendamil Organic Follow-On Milk (European/ British Toddler Formula, for 6-12 months, Cow Milk): Not available on Amazon (report link)
- Infant Formula — 9 — Kendamil Whole Milk Infant Formula (From Europe, Pink Can – Not Organic), available at Target
- Infant Formula — 10 — Kendamil Organic Infant Formula (Cow Milk): Not available on Amazon but may be available at Target
- Ingredient — 1 (salt) — Jacobsen’s Sea Salt (Oregon, USA): https://amzn.to/4dcbk5L
- Ingredient — 2 (baking flour) — Jovial Organic Einkorn Flour (Italy): https://amzn.to/3LIqxix
- Ingredient — 3 (seeds) — Costco Kirkland Organic Hemp Seeds: https://amzn.to/4e05RP9
- Ingredient — 4 (seeds) — Navitas Organic, Gluten-Free Chia Seeds (Mexico): https://amzn.to/3YvE7xC
- Ingredient — 5 (beans) — Jovial Organic Chickpeas – Product of Italy: https://amzn.to/4iRON1l
- Oil — 1 — Chosen Foods 100% Avocado Oil (not organic): https://amzn.to/3YDZSuv
- Oil — 2 — Dr. Adorable’s Organic Perilla Seed Oil (Korea): https://amzn.to/3NDt7Yc
- Plant-Based Milk — 1 — Kiki Milk Organic Plant Based Milk (original flavor): https://amzn.to/3AA6Qrt
- Plant-Based Milk — 2 — West Soy Unflavored Unsweetened Organic Soy Milk: https://amzn.to/4dwev8l
- Supplement — 1 — Baby Ddrops – Organic Vitamin D3 Supplement for Babies: https://amzn.to/49C3ktH
- Supplement — 2 — Nordic Naturals Omega-3 Fish Oil: https://amzn.to/48q1j2V
- Supplement — 3 — Mary Ruth’s Organic Toddler Multivitamin Liquid Drops with Iron: https://amzn.to/3YPhcgx
- Supplement — 4 — Pendulum Metabolic Daily Dietary Supplement: https://amzn.to/4gY5wOm
Here’s a link to the lab reports for of all of the foods and supplements we have tested.
Stand by for more!
–
BONUS FOUR: Below are FOUR additional products that each tested positive for trace (very low levels of) Arsenic — at levels considered safe by all standards (with the limits of detection noted in the lab report for the specific product listed):
- Infant Formula — Kendamil Goat Toddler Milk, not organic (positive for traces of Arsenic): May be available at Target or through other online retailers of European infant formulas
- Fruit Snack — That’s It Apple Cherry Bars, not organic (positive for traces of Arsenic): https://amzn.to/4fHkSWV
- Oil — Chosen Foods 100% Pure Avocado Oil — Organic (postive for traces of Arsenic): https://amzn.to/3BVQYQa
- Supplement — Now Sunflower Lecithin, not organic (positive for traces of Arsenic): https://amzn.to/3AFdHzO
Amazon links are affiliate links.
Published: January 01, 2025
Wednesday
Please scroll down to see the full laboratory test report for the product pictured above. Thank you.
More Key Points To Consider:
- There are almost no reasonable safety limits proposed for toxicant contamination (heavy metal contamination specifically) of foods and supplements consumed by adults (or by the general population) in the United States.
- Any available proposed safety thresholds (and guidance) for foods and supplements consumed by adults are not currently set at levels that are protective of human health, given practical/ actual consumption patterns of foods (vs. manufacturer defined serving sizes).
- The above point is especially important given children eat all foods, not just foods marketed for consumption by children (for example: Find me a pre-teen that won’t go through an entire 5-ounce/ 5-serving bag of potato chips in one sitting)!
- Our focus is (as always) on the health of children.
- By applying the standards proposed by the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021 to all foods and supplements , we are working more in-line with standards that are protective of human health (for all!) given that all scientific and medical experts agree there is no safe level of Lead exposure for human beings.
- Said another way: You would never be eating a snack chip out of a bag and say to your 5-year-old child “this product is only marketed for consumption by adults, so you cannot eat it.” That would be ridiculous. Kids eat what we eat, so everything that goes into our bodies in an attempt to nourish us and support our health and well being should be appropriate for any age consumer (not just a demographic designated by the manufacturer based on irrelevant age-group related toxicity standards for a specific product or ingredient).
- Remember: There is no safe level of Lead exposure for human beings. Period.
- This is a non-negotiable point that everyone in the scientific and medical community — everyone who researches Lead poisoning — agrees with.
This is the Lead Safe Mama Amazon affiliate link to purchase a test kit similar to what we use for our laboratory testing.
To see more articles related to the laboratory testing of foods and supplements Lead Safe Mama, LLC is conducting (including background on this initiative and safer food choices and guidelines), click the pink square below. To see the full, independent, third-party laboratory report for the product pictured above, please scroll down to the bottom of this page.
Amazon links are affiliate links. If you purchase something after clicking on a Lead Safe Mama, LLC Amazon affiliate link, Lead Safe Mama, LLC may receive a percentage of what you spend — at no extra cost to you.
Lab report for the product pictured above:
Never Miss an Important Article Again!
Join our Email List
Have you noticed better levels in things from Europe? I just assume it’s safer because they have better food and water standards but I do remember the salt you tested being very high in heavy metals.
So infuriating! I have been taking this for nearly eight years through four pregnancies! I contacted the company earlier this year to inquire about heavy metals. Their response:
“These are the specification limits for heavy metals we test all products for:
Total Arsenic < 10 mcg/day
Cadmium < 4.1 mcg/day
Total Mercury < 2.0 mcg/day
Lead < 0.5 mcg/day”
How does this compare to ppb?
Same! Just curious, do your kids have eczema by chance?
I hope you can get this product recalled! That’s an insane amount of heavy metals.
Any Lawyers reading this? !! We need a class action lawsuit these companies need to be accountable. This is horrendous!
I was taking these throughout pregnancy and fertility treatments and even during breastfeeding.
This is horrifying. I trusted them with their quality statement:
Meet Our Baby & Me™ Family
All of our prenatal and postnatal products are tested not only for over 125 different herbicides and pesticides (including glyphosate), but a host of heavy metals (lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury) and contaminants (yeasts, molds, e. Coli, and more). What’s more, they are all vegetarian, gluten, dairy, and soy-free.
How they are even test this??
Yes – they test for them, but they don’t share the test results (and they don’t guarantee that their products are free of those metals, but their public statement makes customers believe they are free of those metals – it’s implied and not direct, so they cannot be sued for fraud / misrepresentation / lying). It’s a common turn-of-phrase for greenwashing companies!
Hmm, I always thought the company cannot be sued if they put a label on their product stating that the product contains dangerous ingredients, like they do in California. In this case they don’t have a warning label, but they can always blame on the bad batch and do a batch recall.
Another example is suing a pharmaceutical company if their medication contains a cancer-causing ingredient.
Answer:
“Yes, you can sue a pharmaceutical company if you develop cancer after taking a medication that contains a known cancer-causing ingredient, as this falls under product liability law and you can potentially file a lawsuit claiming the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug; a well-known example is suing a company for cancer related to taking Zantac, which was recalled due to a carcinogenic contaminant.”
Thanks for your work!
I left a review regarding your testing at their website. It appears they scrubbed it clean. I tried to leave one on Amazon, but the review is pending and may take several days.
Same boat as other commenters – been using Men’s Multi for years, and wife used prenatal and postnatal multi.
Everything went in the trash this morning.
It surely appears to me that Megafood is deceptive. Good Riddance.
Tamara, on your comment about greenwashing, I recently encountered another company that did exactly what you described.
Forefront Health beat around the bush in a series of emails, Failed to provide a COA stating “Our supplements undergo rigorous testing to ensure they meet or exceed all applicable safety standards and regulations.” When I push harder she said she would have to get more details from the owner, Tom. I waited a month and heard noting. I reached back out for an update and was hit with this response: “Good afternoon! There is no update, as you can imagine with the holidays. However, it is unlikely to be anytime soon, as he has other priorities coming up for the new year”
You really can’t rust anyone with your health. Verify Verify Verify.
Wow. Thank you for sharing that.