As shared on Instagram
November 15, 2024
Last Updated: November 16, 2024
DRAFT IN PROGRESS:
Here’s a list for Lead Poisoning Prevention Initiatives that could be implemented in the next four years (with a little collaboration, conversation, and enforcement!)
[I will be working on this over the next couple of days (in response to the inquiry shared in the screenshot above)… It’s a draft outline right now – so check back here later. I will share it on the Lead Safe Mama email newsletter as soon as it is finished!]
Background of the Issue of Childhood Lead Poisoning
- Childhood Lead poisoning is the single most societally expensive and single most preventable environmental illness impacting children (and families today).
- In 2011, Dr. Leonardo Trasande (currrently with NYU Medical) estimated (in his published environment impact report) that the total cost of environmental impacts on children’s health was $76,600,000,000 ($76.6 Billion) annually.
- Of that $76.6 Billion in annual impacts from toxics exposures to children, $50.9 billion of those costs were attributable to Lead exposure.
- Said another way environmental impacts of all toxicants combined – excluding Lead – is $25.7 Billion annually.
- Said another way – the impacts of all other chemicals combined on children’s health (mercury, bpa, pfas, plastics, etc) is only about HALF the financial impacts of Lead alone.
- Lead poisoning was not eradicated with the 1978 “ban” on Lead in house paint, and is very much still a significant problem in the United States today.
- This $50.9 billion annual cost (in 2011 dollars) is conservative and focuses on medical impacts and I.Q. loss, both of which are metrics that do not begin to quantify the true financial impacts of Lead exposure. Costs omitted from this economic impact report include: relocation costs, renovation cost, lost income of parents managing their children’s lead exposure and subsequent disabilities, legal system costs, long-term disability support costs, special education costs (through college and beyond), incarceration costs, and more.
- The true cost is much, much greater – likely in the range of hundreds of billions annually in the United States alone – when all costs (both long-term and short-term) to families and to society are taken into account.
To reiterate: Childhood Lead Poisoning is the SINGLE MOST EXPENSIVE and SINGLE MOST PREVENTABLE environmental illness impacting families today. To not address this issue with a comprehensive plan for primary prevention would be criminal.
The guiding principle for each of these areas will be to rely on the latest science in each area – science that is not protective of industry – but science that is focused on being fully protective of human health (with the priority being protecting children – our most vulnerable citizens).
Focus Area Index (Details for Each of These Areas Are Below)
- Maternal Health (Prenatal / Preconception)
- Children’s Health (Birth to 18 years+)
- Comprehensive Blood Lead Level Testing (not age restricted)
- Occupational Health Standards & The Impact on Children
- Comprehensive Health Protective Standards for Lead in Housing
- Comprehensive Health Protective Standards for Lead in Water
- Comprehensive Protections for Children and Students in School (through college)
- Comprehensive Standardized Limits for Lead (& other toxicants) in all foods
- Comprehensive Regulation for Non-Food Personal Care Products
- Comprhensive Regulation of Cookware and Kitchenware
- Comprehensive Regulation of Decorative Consumer Goods
- Supporting Families of Lead Poisoned Children
- Enforcement of Fine & Penalties to Landlords & Contractors
- An appropriate XRF instrument in every health department
- Functional Disability Accommodations For People with Lead Poisoning in School
- Right to Lead-free housing for required college housing
- Comprehensive Education of Medical Providers
- Hazard Assessment of All Homes with transfer of resident (rental or purchase)
- Science-Based Improvements to the EPA RRP Rule
Focus Area #1)
Maternal Health (Preconception / Prenatal)
Narrative: Childhood Lead poisoning prevention starts with mom. If mothers (and prospective mothers) are made aware of the persistent / current / ongoing concern for childhood Lead poisoning in America today – they will be in position to take action for primary prevention (to prevent childhood Lead poisoning BEFORE it happens). Key actions include:
- All interventions below should not be contingent on any demographic factors (race, socio-economic, religion, etc.)
- Modeled after the Finnish baby box policy – which is for all citizens who have babies.
- Given the demonstrated impact of dietary concerns to elevate BLL’s above 0.5, traditional “risk factors” should not be considered (as they are no longer relevant).
- Comprehensive annual preconception blood lead level (BLL*) testing (with the Pap Smear schedule), starting in the teen years.
- Comprehensive prenatal blood lead level (BLL) testing, testing starting with the first OBGYN visit in pregnancy.
- Comprehensive public health education for women of childbearing age (starting in high school?) regarding Lead exposure and the potential impacts of Lead exposure on a child. This could be a one-day (8 hour) class or a certificate class along the lines of current programs for “First Aid”, “CPR”, or “Pool Safety”
- Interventions for women who test positive with a BLL of 0.3* (micrograms of Lead per deciliter of blood) or higher (with the above initiatives):
- Home assessments
- Dietary assessments
- Additional Education
*0.3 is not arbitrary – it is based on the research of Dr. Felicia Rabito (Professor, Tulane), whose 2014 published research study demonstrated negative birth outcomes (and pregnancy complications) were correlated with BLL’s as low as 0.43 (and possibly lower).
BLL testing with point-of-care screening tools (in clinic) can cost as little as $7.00 per test (2015 numbers). Magellan Diagnostic’s LeadCare II has just recently been approved for testing down to a BLL of 1.5. Labcorp can test down to BLL’s as low as 0.1 with a doctor’s prescription.
Focus Area #2)
Children’s Health (Birth to 18+ years)
Current standards & initiatives for childhood Lead poisoning prevention focus on children ages 1 year old to six years old. This is a misguided focus as children of any age can be poisoned and children of any age (into young adulthood and beyond) can be greatly impacted by Lead exposure. Our responsibility to protect children from Lead exposure (and inform and educate parents) should start at birth and extend through college.
- Change recommended blood testing intervals to be more protective of children’s health.
- Pre-crawling (6 to 8 monhts)
- Post-crawling (12-15 months)
- Every 6 months through age 3
- Annually after age three, through age 18 (with annual checkups)
- Increase education to pediatricians regarding potential sources of Lead exposure that impact children of all ages
- Parental occupational exposures
- Dietary exposures
- Housing exposures
- School exposures
- Hobby related exposures for children (including hunting & shooting sports, fishing, model making, electronic-focused hobbies, stained glass, etc.)
- Expand the pediatric screening questionnaire for childhood Lead poisoning to include the above considerations
- Remove socioeconomic considerations from the questionnaire
- Remove racial demographic from the questionnaire
- Support change to low threshold of detection for most commonly used BLL testing methodologies to lowest possible thresholds of detection (approaching 0.1 micrograms per decilitier)
Focus Area #3)
Blood Lead Testing (Comprehensive – not age restricted)
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #4)
Occupational Health Standards (OSHA) and the Impact on Children
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #5)
Standardization of Housing Concerns to Be Protective of Children’s Health
- Testing guidelines & Limits (dust, water, soil)
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #6)
Standardization of Water Concerns to be Protective of Children’s Health
- Housing, School, Public Water Sources
- Fluoride concerns
- x
- x
Focus Area #7)
Standardization of School Concerns (regardless of age of construction of school buildings) – for all schools, pre-K throuugh University (including University Housing)
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #8)
Standardization of Food Concerns (across all ingested products – Foods & Supplements)
- Babies eat all food, food should not be protected only because it is baby food
- Harsh penalties for companies selling toxic products marketed and sold specifically for consumption by children
- x
- x
Focus Area #9)
Comprehensive Regulation for Non-Food Personal Care Products (toothpaste, cosmetics, face masks, baby powders,etc.)
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #10)
Comprhensive Regulation of Cookware and Kitchenware (all items used for preparation and serving of foods
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #11)
Comprehensive Regulation of Decorative Consumer Goods (regardless of age of intended comsumer)
- x
- x
- x
- x
Focus Area #12)
Supporting Families of Lead Poisoned Children
Systemic racism in enforcement and compliance of DHHS / CPS policies protecting children has continued to impact families of Lead poisoned children in extremely harmful ways. Black families whose children are diagnosed with Lead poisoning are significantly more likely to be threatened (by Child Protect Services or other agencies involved) with removal of their children from the home than white families. In all cases – regardless or racial or socioeconomic factors, separation of families of Lead poisoned children should never happen, instead resources to support and relocate these families who are (in most cases) victims of negligent landlords should be allocated, and a structure of support should be put in place.
- Funding needs to be allocated to prioritize helping families in crisis when their children have been poisoned
- This funding should be modeled after the Bronx Montefiore Medical System’s program which has a “safe house” program for families of children who have been Lead poisoned.
- Families are given free alternate furnished (Lead-free) safe housing until their child’s medical situation has resolved.
- Families should be given appropriate medical treatment and interventions (alternate Lead-free housing is a medical intervention in the case of a Lead poisoned child)
- This should be cost-free for impacted families.
- Regardless of the availability of an official “safe house” in an area, when a landlord is at fault (this includes any instance when a child has been poisoned in a rental home, in which the default conclusion should be that the landlord is “at fault”) the landlord should be made to pay immediate relocation costs for families (moving costs, plus first month + last month and deposit for new, lead-free alternate housing).
- This housing needs to be appropriate and comparable for the family – for example if the family has pets, the new alternate housing should also be pet-friendly and the landlord responsible for the child’s poisoning should pay any pet deposits as well.
- Landlords may push back against this policy – but the intention behind it is that NO children will be poisoned as landlords will be “encouraged” to remove all Lead hazards from their rental units so that children are NEVER poisoned. The responsibility of landlords to pay relocation costs will serve as a deterrent.
- families should not be required to seek out substandard housing not equal to their current accommodations in amenities)
Focus Area #13)
Enforcement of Fine & Penalties to Landlords & Contractors
Focus area #14)
An appropriate XRF instrument in every health department – starting with each of the 52 State Health Departments (A 2025 version of A Chicken in Every Pot!)
Focus area #15)
Functional Disability Accommodations For People with Lead Poisoning in School – Through College Years (& Graduate School)
Focus area #16)
Right to Lead-free housing for required college housing
Focus area #17)
Comprehensive Education of Medical Providers
Focus area #18)
Hazard Assessment of All Homes with transfer of resident (rental or purchase)
Focus area #19)
Science-Based Improvements to the EPA RRP Rule
Karen says
WooHoo! And yay!!
After learning that RFKj was seeking input from the public for names of people who could join the Trump administration to bring much needed change to our country in the area of health, I went to his site to put your name in the hat. I didn’t know if you’d be down for a position, but your knowledge and experience would be a stellar addition. I am so glad someone “in the camp” knows your work and reached out to you. I’m sure this individual is the one who already nominated you, but others can vote to show their support and belief in you and your work.
What you’ve put together in response is proof that you would be a fantastic resource and addition.
https://discourse.nomineesforthepeople.com/t/tamara-rubin/4498
Tamara says
Thank you. Actually this is not who nominated me, another member of the Lead Safe Mama community nominated me. Thank you for sharing that link here.
Tamara
Rebecca says
So you’re gonna be a sell out too?! Shame. But I’m not surprised!!
Tamara says
We have no choice. Trump was elected president. This is a fact. If there is an opportunity to help children under this new administration, we should take it (we should at least try to make it work).
T
Liz says
This is awesome!!! So wonderful that they are reaching out to you and that you are going to help them out! Your experience and knowledge about lead issues being used in government to actually make changes is a dream come true.
Annie says
Excellent start! ❤