Hestan Nanobond Stainless Steel 3 -quart Saucepan, “Made in Italy”: non-detect for Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic, Mercury and Antimony.
XRF test results for the pan pictured.
Reading #1) Interior Food Surface of the Pan (flat interior bottom)
90-second test
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 335,400 +/- 1,200 ppm
- Vanadium (V): 1,728 +/- 286 ppm
- Manganese (Mn): 9,375 +/- 745 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 574,700 +/- 1,600 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 10,100 +/- 800 ppm
- Nickel (Ni): 55,600 +/- 800 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 346 +/- 108 ppm
- Titanium (Ti): 12,500 +/- 500 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
Reading #2) Exterior (Flat) Bottom of Pan
60-second test
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 365,200 +/- 1,500 ppm
- Vanadium (V): 523 +/- 333 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 599,200 +/- 2,100 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 11,200 +/- 1,000 ppm
- Nickel (Ni): 551 +/- 258 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 1,755 +/- 180 ppm
- Titanium (Ti): 18,200 +/- 700 ppm
- Niobium (Nb): 1,213 +/- 58 ppm
- Tin (Sn): 1,983 +/- 61 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
Reading #3) Handle of Pan
60-second test (Stainless Steel #304)
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 177,200 +/- 1,100 ppm
- Vanadium (V): 1,271 +/- 254 ppm
- Manganese (Mn): 8,853 +/- 776 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 729,600 +/- 1,800 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 2,631 +/- 944 ppm
- Nickel (Ni): 78,500 +/- 1,100 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 1,296 +/- 195 ppm
- Molybdenum (Mo): 636 +/- 85 ppm
- Tin (Sn): 42 +/- 27 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
Reading #4) Exterior Vertical Side of Pan
60-second test
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Nickel (Ni): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 434,100 +/- 1,800 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 520,700 +/- 2,300 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 12,600 +/- 1,100 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 1,527 +/- 179 ppm
- Titanium (Ti): 26,600 +/- 800 ppm
- Niobium (Nb): 1,268 +/- 61 ppm
- Molybdenum (Mo): 768 +/- 81 ppm
- Tin (Sn): 2,007 +/- 65 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
Reading #5) Interior Vertical Side of Pan
60-second test
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 303,600 +/- 1,500 ppm
- Vanadium (V): 1,775 +/- 349 ppm
- Manganese (Mn): 8,971 +/- 923 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 606,200 +/- 2,000 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 7,918 +/- 1,019 ppm
- Nickel (Ni): 61,200 +/- 1,000 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 405 +/- 146 ppm
- Titanium (Ti): 9,786 +/- 586 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
Reading #6) Exterior Connection Points for Handle of Pan
60-second test (Stainless Steel #304)
- Lead (Pb): non-detect
- Cadmium (Cd): non-detect
- Mercury (Hg): non-detect
- Bromine (Br): non-detect
- Arsenic (As): non-detect
- Chromium (Cr): 184,500 +/- 1,100 ppm
- Vanadium (V): 1,414 +/- 260 ppm
- Manganese (Mn): 8,350 +/- 769 ppm
- Iron (Fe): 701,300 +/- 1,800 ppm
- Cobalt (Co): 1,817 +/- 917 ppm
- Nickel (Ni): 80,300 +/- 1,100 ppm
- Copper (Cu): 20,000 +/- 600 ppm
- Molybdenum (Mo): 1,901 +/- 99 ppm
- Tin (Sn): 99 +/- 28 ppm
- No other metals detected in consumer goods mode.
For those new to this website:
Tamara Rubin is a Federal-award-winning independent advocate for consumer goods safety and a documentary filmmaker. She is also a mother of Lead-poisoned children. Tamara’s sons were acutely Lead-poisoned in August of 2005. She began testing consumer goods for toxicants in 2009 and was the parent-advocate responsible for finding Lead in the popular fidget spinner toys in 2017. Tamara uses XRF testing (a scientific method used by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission) to test consumer goods for toxicants (specifically heavy metals), including Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, Antimony, and Arsenic. All test results reported on this website are science-based, accurate, and replicable. Items are tested multiple times, to confirm the test results for each component tested and reported on. Please click through to this link to learn more about the testing methodology used for the test results discussed and reported on this website.
Never Miss an Important Article Again!
Join our Email List
Any recommendations for lightweight containers like silicone for food?
No. I will never recommend silicone based products – they test positive for toxicants far too often.
Here’s my shopping site:
https://shopleadsafemama.com/2021/05/menu/
Tamara
Oh my gosh, thank you for this test! I was the one on Instagram who said we use these. I was incredibly worried when it showed you tested Hestan. The Nanobond are by far my absolute favorite pots and pans. Your page has been so informative ever since finding you recently. Thank you for all you do. I’m just baffled learning about bunnikins and many of the other items. We will be making changes for sure.
So in short the nanobond is safe to use with my children?
Hello Tamara,
I see that the test is showing some detection does this mean that this pot is not safe to use?
Thanks,
James X
Hi is titanium safe? Are these pans safe? I’m reading titanium oxide is toxic
Is this brand good then ?
Hi Tamra. There is a brand call Tritania and this is their claim on their website. “100% TOXIN FREE – TRITANIA cooking units are not only free of PFOA, PTFE, and PFAS, but also free of nickel, chromium, copper, lead, cadmium, and every other heavy metal potentially harmful to health.”
https://www.tritaniacookware.com/en/pages/salute
Would love to know if this is a brand you will be testing soon?
Hi Tamra. I forgot to mention that Tritania has been working with the line Du Buoi and Du Buoi is available in the USA. Same claim is made on the Du Buoi site as the Tritania site of having “ Zero-Toxic Titanium Cookware”.
https://www.duebuoispatulastore.com/collections/zero-toxic-titanium-cookware
I would be interested in seeing testing on these brands with those claims. Please let me know if you plan on testing one or both of them.
Thank you
Hello,
Please can you explain these results.. is this pan sage to use for myself and my children?